同洲电子和捷成股份 一护vs乌尔奇奥拉

Geeya is eight fund pipansihuan: 13 "limit"! (photo) – Sohu finance, first of all, we counted all the A shares of listed companies involved in the field of digital TV static price earnings ratio, in order to estimate the stock price of gold and technology asia. As can be seen from the table, the longer trading time of the gold and technology price earnings ratio (Note: statistics are static price earnings ratio) is indeed much higher than the same company’s P / E ratio. Exclusion is currently in the suspension LETV, Coship and Jebsen shares, A shares of digital TV operators in the average price earnings ratio of 104 times, while the GEM listed companies earnings ratio of 176 times. If the earnings per share of the 2014 annual report disclosed by Jin Ya science and technology 0.1 yuan, its share price should be 10.4 yuan -17.6 yuan. However, due to the problems in the financial statements, we can not simply use the P / E formula to estimate the stock price. And then compare the gap between gold technology and the same industry companies since the suspension since June 9, 2015. In the past 8 months, the average decline of related industries was about 41.5%, with a median decrease of 42.95%. In other words, if the general decline in the same industry companies, the reasonable price of gold and technology should be about 26 yuan. If the gem company’s decline in the median of 36.7% as a reference, the stock price of gold and technology will be higher, in the vicinity of 28.5 yuan. But taking into account the golden Asia science and technology for a long time, and negative reports during the suspension more, the stock price is actually difficult to accurately predict. There are investors in the online statement said, "give geeya 8.67 yuan valuation is too high, 1 yuan overvalued", this is more or less reflects investors for financial fraud, cheating investors behavior discontent. From the delisting of the Asian technology storm, we can see that with the fund company significantly reduce the valuation of gold and technology, investors have been in the future of the gold and silver technology to pay the pessimistic outlook. Although gold technology delisting storm later or turn for the better, but after the resumption of the stock market will inevitably appear stampede of investors. Source China fund newspaper

金亚科技被八家基金判死缓:13个“跌停”!(组图)-搜狐财经  首先,我们统计了A股所有涉及数字电视运营领域的上市公司的静态市盈率,以此来估计一下金亚科技的股价。  从表中可以看出,停牌时间较长的金亚科技的市盈率(注:统计口径均为静态市盈率)确实要比同行业公司的市盈率高出不少。排除目前处于停牌的乐视网,同洲电子和捷成股份,A股数字电视运营商平均市盈率在104倍左右,而创业板相关行业公司的市盈率为176倍。  如果以金亚科技2014年年报披露的每股收益0.1元,其股价应在10.4元-17.6元。不过,由于金亚科技的财务报表存在问题,我们不能单纯地运用市盈率公式来估计其股价。  再来比较一下金亚科技与同行业的公司自2015年6月9日停牌至今的区间涨跌幅。相关行业在过去8个多月的时间里平均跌幅近41.5%,跌幅中位数为42.95%。  换言之,如果以同行业公司普遍跌幅来看,金亚科技的合理股价应在26元左右。如果以创业板公司区间跌幅的中位数36.7%作为参考,金亚科技的股价会更高一些,在28.5元附近。但考虑到金亚科技停牌时间较长,且停牌期间负面报道较多,其股价实际上很难准确预估。  有股民在网上发言称,“给金亚科技8.67元的估值还是太高了,1元都高估”,这多多少少反映了股民对财务造假、欺骗投资者等行为的不满情绪。  从金亚科技的退市风波中可以看出,随着基金公司大幅调低金亚科技估值,投资者已经在为金亚科技的悲观前景埋单。虽然金亚科技的退市风波后期或有转机,但其复牌后难免不会出现投资者的踩踏事件。来源中国基金报)相关的主题文章: